Philosophy In Action All the ideas and discussions
7 votes Vote

Does egoism suffer from "one thought too many"?

Bernard Williams argues that utilitarianism suffers from a problem of inappropriate motivation in which a person has "one thought too many" before acting morally. So, for example, a good utilitarian must calculate whether the general welfare is served by saving a drowning child before jumping into the water. A truly good person, in contrast, simply jumps into the water to save the child without that calculation. Wouldn't this same objection apply to even rational, benevolent egoism? Or are those extra thoughts between situation and action actually rational?

Anonymous , 13.03.2014, 17:25
Idea status: completed

Comments

Ragnar Weskar, 23.04.2014, 20:13
A rational-ego means that importance is placed on the hierarchy of values. A rational-egoist would courteously save a drowning child provided that there was no sacrifice involved for either party. Defining sacrifice as the rational-egoist does not put themselves in harm's way either by lack of knowledge of swimming or some other danger that might cause the victim more harm by interfering. A rational concern for self does not imply trampling or being destructive on others to gain what a person wants instead it means pursuing your rational self-interest goals first and if along the way consensually trade with others whom help you achieve. A rational-egoist understands that long range thinking and productive achievement is important to his or her survival. Being destructive to others is what malevolent, incompetent non-productive parasitic evil men or women do. They steal a living rather than earn.

Leave a comment