Philosophy In Action All the ideas and discussions
29 votes Vote

What were Ayn Rand's shortcomings in her understanding and/or practice of Objectivism?

After having listened to a number of Rationally Selfish Webcast episodes, some passing statements make it sound like Ayn Rand had a complete understand and perfect execution of Objectivism. I'm attracted to Objectivism as a rational approach to morality and philosophy but bothered by how untouchable Ayn Rand appears to be. To compare Isaac Newton did wonders for the world of physics but if we hadn't evolved his theories our world today wouldn't be as advanced as it is today. Maybe a better question would be: What progress in understanding has been made by Objectivists since Rand's death?

Sandy McArthur , 20.03.2011, 23:55
Idea status: completed

Comments

SHathway, 01.04.2011, 10:42
My two cents: I have a habit of separating ideas from personalities. I admire and attempt to implement the ideas Ayn Rand espoused. They are great! Perhaps what you are hearing is our admiration for her ideas.
I would worry less about any idiosyncratic behavior reported by former friends or associates. You should focus on understanding the ideas.
I believe this question stems from the common practice of discrediting ideas by bashing the personality of the person who advocates them. Or, alternatively, a discomfort when presented with a personality that appears too perfect. If a person puts forth a rational, life-affirming idea, I would suggest you evaluate it on its own merit.
I also recognize that personality provides a context within which the idea should be taken. For example, had Hilter advocated rational self-interest, I would have to evaluate this idea in the context of the Holocaust. But I am pretty sure Ayn Rand didn't commit any such atrocities. ;)
Reply

Leave a comment